Des astronautes ont-ils vraiment posé le pied sur la Lune? Voici le cas désolant d'un amateur qui pense avoir prouvé que la NASA a menti et fabriqué de fausses images. Ce faisant, il prouve essentiellement son incompétence et manque de réflexion, et, à son insu, il me permet de montrer un vaste ensemble d'indices tendant à démontrer (s'il fallait le faire) que les astronautes de la NASA se sont bel et bien posé sur la Lune.
Alors que quelques rares scientifiques et de nombreux amateurs sont troublés à tort ou à raison par des anomalies photographiés sur la surface de Mars, d'autres s'acharnent à vouloir en trouver dans la moinde photo de la Lune. Voici un gallimatia de "villes Lunaires", "routes", "exploitations minières" et "engins excavateurs" que j'ai bien du mal à discerner, et les explications plus simples de ces "anomalies".
And once again, a scientist in denial concludes there is no fossil in the Martian meteorite wile he never ever looked at it.
Anything is good to dismiss the UFO question:
The British Ministry of Defense wrote a secret report: UFOs are "mostly" ball lightning. The 2006 Press goes wild: "ET was just a puff of plasma?"
Are UFOs in fact secret aircrafts? Indeed, sometimes aircraft misinterpreted for alien spaceships. But here is a set of examples of the ridiculous propositions to "explain" UFOs using so-called secret aircrafts.
The French counterpart of NASA, CNES has a presentation of Mars on its web site, we learn that they plan to bring Martian soil samples with possible microbes back, while otherwise the incredibly red planet is described as "absolutely sterile".
CIA recently claimed, against its own archived evidence, that the U-2 spy plane "explains" 50% of the UFO observations in the years following its first flight. It is statistically wrong.
Much fuss in the media and nothing comes out of it:
Tunguska 2004: suddenly all the big news agency report that debris of an extraterrestrial spacecraft have been found by Russian scientists at the infamous Tunguska site. And that's all.
Media stupidity:
A recent example: a totally biased and absurd article by a notorious debunker is reproduced all across TV, newspapers, radios, web sites. We are told that the "UFO Bureau" in UK shuts down due to lack of UFO sightings. There is a huge gap between this proclamation and the event that started it.
The debate rages about alleged vegetation and glass pipes on Mars, Sir Arthur C. Clarke suddenly reveals himself as a new born believer and gets censored.
The Washington Post interviews scientists who seemed to claim in 1983 that the famous Planet X or Nibiru has been detected by the IRAS satellite. Not quite.
Scientific stupidities:
The Washington Post interviews scientists who seemed to claim in 1983 that the famous Planet X or Nibiru has been detected by the IRAS satellite. Not quite.
Disney TV documentary Close Encounters, or how to drag visitors to Disneyworld thanks to the UFO phenomenon.
UFOs explaine, finally!
I'm a fool! I wasted so much time on these UFOs, and here it was, unbeknownst to me: blammo! The final explanation. I am now wearing a sack, I threw some ashes on my just shaved head and stroll in the streets telling people how dumb I was.
