ET -> Photographs -> Homeclick!

Cette page en franšaisCliquez!

Alleged photographs of ET beings:

A vast number of photographs is circulating, with no indication of source or additional information. I have difficulties locating additional information and would appreciate any informative help.


After gathering and investigating many alleged photographs of extraterrestrial beings, my overall impression is that most of them are proven hoaxes, some of the rest might be genuine or hoaxed. But it is not within my range of competence to qualify each photograph as hoax or genuine. I am not claiming any kind of "truth," I have no desire to "convince" any one in any way, I have no certain "final word" explanation for most of the pictures presented here.

This section of the site is only intended as a recollection of such photographs and offers comments from various sources, "as is." I appreciate every precise information item you might offer.

Careful: some of these pictures are rather disturbing, even in the cases of proven hoaxes. Please leave this page now if you are not willing to confront disturbing or frightening pictures.

Photographs without precise data:

Note: the expression "without precise data" means that I did not find enough data, it does not imply that there is no precise data at all. I did not necessarily used much tom to look for more information so far.

Alleged "Dropa" mummy:

This photograph is from a Russian web site devoted to exploration of ancient mysteries, ancient civilization, and UFOS. Very little information is provided about the origin or dating of this picture, presented as remains of the infamous "Dropas", alleged aliens or alleged ancestors of aliens that crashed to Earth a very long time ago.


Published on the cover of a UFO magazine:

This spaceman with large eyes or glasses appeared on the cover of the "Saucerian Bulletin." This bulletin was edited by Gray Barker, a lover of mysteries and author of "They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers" and "The Silver Bridge." Barker is also known for having published fiction as fact for the sake of entertainment, he confessed on occasion that he did not take the subject of UFOs seriously; so, unless I find more information to justify interest in this picture, let's put a temporary blank on it.


Milagros Garcia:

According to some websites, a woman named Milagros Garcia claims to be a human-alien hybrid, the offspring of an alien encounter. It is claimed that "upon sampling of her blood, the results show a very unusual DNA. Although this type of DNA is possible in humans it is 'very rare' and worth further research."

I found zero information on that story so far.

On the left of the picture is Milagros Garcia's mother and Milagros Garcia is on the right.


Omnec Onec:

This attractive female made quite an impression at the first International UFO Congress convened in Tucson, Arizona, in November 1991, when she introduced herself as Omnec Onec from planet Venus to some 300 attendants.

She looked 35, but claimed to be 439. Obviously quite intelligent; one of the admirers said:

"She said she had solved the interplanetary transportation problem as simply as she had solved the planetary surface temperature problem. She so eloquently explained how she merely hyper-jumped dimensions. And everyone there understood. No one ever understands Stanton Friedman's explanations about time-travel physics, but everyone understood Omnec. at least the interdimensional things. Her true message was one of spiritual development and universal love. But she could discuss Grassman Algebra if you wanted to."

So why do I file this lady in the "insufficient data" file? The picture is authentic and the story full of details. However, where is the evidence that she does travel though interdimensional realms?


See also:

Click! Photographs that are not hoaxes but misinterpretations.
Click! Photographs that are admitted hoaxes.
Click! Photographs of non-aliens later presented as "true" aliens.
Click! Photographs considered as hoaxes but not admitted hoaxes.
Click! Photographs that are probably hoaxes.
Cliquez! Photographs with interpretation problems.
Click! Photographs under debate.
Click! Photographs that might not be hoaxed.

Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

 Feedback  |  Top  |  Back  |  Forward  |  Map  |  List |  Home
This page was last updated on March 16, 2010.