HomeHome
Cette page en français

Ufology

CAUTION:

THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, COPYING AND ADERVIZING FORBIDDEN BY THE AUTHOR UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.

RAW DATA SET:

The raw data set is an electronic spreadsheet table provided by P2. Cases have been numbered and data converted to HTML to the following table by this author:
CN Date Approx Explanation Location Region Mode Photographer
c127.07.1909 Lenticular cloudDroebach (Norway)PhotoC. Stormer
Sources: N/A.
c201.02.1951MDLenticular cloudKaiapoi (New Zealand)Photo
Sources: http://www.bluebookarchive.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB1-44 USAF. Larry Robinson. David C. Knight, UFO. A Pictorial History from Antiquity to the Present, McGraw-Hill, 1979, p 47. W. Stevens and A. Roberts, UFO Photographs Around the World, 1985.
c331.05.1953Lenticular cloudJindabyna, Snowy Mountains, New South Wales (Australia)NSWPhoto
Sources: Donald Menzel and Lyle Boyd, The World of Flying Saucers, Doubleday, 1963, pp 26-27 and 30, quoting Weather, November 1954.
c429.12.1956Lenticular cloudPigtail Peak, White Pass, Washington (USAWAPhoto
Sources: Donald Menzel and Lyle Boyd, The World of Flying Saucers, Doubleday, 1963, pp 28-30 and plate Ia, quoting Weatherwise, Vol XI, 1958, p 43. Luis Ruiz Nóguez, Perspectivas Ufológicas, February 1996, p 56.
c524.03.1957Lenticular cloudCamarillo, California (USACAPhotoAgnes Sanborn
Sources: George M. Eberhart, International UFO Reporter, Vol 29, No 2, Summer 2004, p 21. Max B. Miller (ed), Flying Saucer Pictorial, Arizill, 1967, p 38.
c615.08.1957Lenticular cloudVernet-Les-Bains, Pyrénées orientales (France)PhotoMorel
Sources: Phénomenes Spatiaux, March 1967, pp 14-15. Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos.
c716.10.1957Lenticular cloudTularosa, New Mexico (USANMPhotoElla Louise Fortune
Sources: Flying Saucers, Cowles, 1967, cover. Max B. Miller (ed), Flying Saucers Pictorial, Arizill, 1967, p 59. http://www.bluebookarchive.org/page.aspx?PageCode=MAXW-PBB2-409 USAF.
c813.12.1958Lenticular cloud/FakeRedlands, California (USACAPhotoJohn Penney
Sources: http://www.bluebookarchive.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB1-208 USAF. Larry Robinson.
c901.01.1964MDLenticular cloudMount Rainier, Washington (USAWAPhoto
Sources: Luis Ruiz Noguez.
c1001.09.1965DLenticular cloudBrno (Czecoslovakia)Photo
Sources: Robert Jackson, U.F.O.s, Shooting Star, 1995, p 13. Luis Ruiz Noguez.
c1101.01.1966MDLenticular cloudLa Matanza (Tenerife)38PhotoIrmi Heiman
Sources: N/A.
c46.01.01.1966MDLenticular cloudAosta (Italy)AOPhoto
Sources: Dossier OVNI, Orbis, 1997, issue number 11, p 47.
c1216.04.1966Lenticular cloudTuxpan, Jalisco (Mexico)JALPhotoHéctor M. Horta
Sources: N/A.
c1323.11.1966Lenticular cloudBenidorm (Alicante)03PhotoGunther Fensk Wildemann
Sources: Mattern-Freidrich, UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapons?, Samisdat Publishers Ltd., page 134. Pierre Delval, El gran libro de los OVNI, De Vecchi, 1977, plate.
c47.07.01.1968Lenticular cloudSierra Nevada (Granada)18PhotoIgnacio Darnaude
Sources: CEI (Barcelona), quoting La aviazione di altri planeti, May 1968.
c1401.01.1969MDLenticular cloudSierra Tarahumara, Chihuahua (México)CHIHPhoto
Sources: N/A.
c1512.10.1970Lenticular cloudMarasesti (Romania)PhotoJulien Weverbergh
Sources: Ion Hobana and Julien Weverbergh, UFO´s From Behind the Iron Curtain, Souvenir Press, 1972, page 105.
c1605.02.1973Lenticular cloudJaman-Tau, Urales (Russia)Photo
Sources: N/A.
c1711.08.1974Lenticular cloudPerpignan (France)PhotoLolita Rassin
Sources: Lumières Dans La Nuit, June-July 1975, page 23.
c1801.11.1974DLenticular cloudLago Agrio, Neuquén (Argentina)NEUPhotoVictor and Silvia de Cerasale
Sources: Cuarta Dimensión, 15, p 35 (not consulted).
c1922.03.1975Lenticular cloudVandellós (Tarragona)43PhotoVicente Ballester
Sources: N/A.
c2019.01.1977Lenticular cloudCol du Puymorens, Ariège (France)PhotoPatricia Monin
Sources: La Depêche du Midi (Toulouse), January 20 , 1977; and January 30, page 1. Perspectivas Ufológicas, February 1996. Luis Ruiz Noguez.
c2101.02.1977DLenticular cloudGreenland Naval Station (Denmark)Photo
Sources: N/A.
c2212.11.1977Lenticular cloudPerpignan (France)PhotoJosé María Casas-Huguet
Sources: CEI (Barcelona).
c2302.05.1978Lenticular cloudSan Carlos Bariloche, Rio Negro (Argentina)RNPhotoElida Peláez de Corletto
Sources: Perspectivas Ufológicas, February 1996. Luis Ruiz Noguez. Clarin (Buenos Aires), end August 1978. Roberto E. Banchs. Cosmovisión, 3, October 1978. Cuarta Dimensión, No 72, 1978 (Carlos Ferguson). http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/3823/ar780824.htm
c2401.01.1979MDLenticular cloudTenerife38Photo
Sources: N/A.
c2501.01.1979MDLenticular cloudLambert Lane, Arizona (USAAZPhoto"Johnny"
Sources: N/A.
c2603.02.1979Lenticular cloudMont-Blanc (France)PhotoAnnie Trubert
Sources: Jean-Michel Ligeron, O.V.N.I. en Ardennes, 1981, p 195.
c2701.01.1980MDLenticular cloudToluca, México (México)PhotoRolando Muñoz
Sources: N/A
c2801.01.1981MDLenticular cloudBonn (Germany)Photo
Sources: N/A.
c2930.08.1981Lenticular cloudRaub (Malaysia)PhotoHeng Chiang Teck
Sources: N/A
c3001.01.1982MDLenticular cloudLos Andes, Valparaíso (Chile)VPhoto
Sources: N/A
c3115.01.1982Lenticular cloudSan Martín de los Andes, Neuquén (Argentina)NEUPhotoJuan Carlos Ferreyra
Sources: Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos.
c3208.09.1986Lenticular cloudIrutup Island, Kuriles (Russia)Photo
Sources: http://www.vadim-andreev.narod.ru/ufo/foto1.htm Mikhail Gershtein.
c3315.12.1988Lenticular cloudIvina, Utah (USAUTPhotoJean y Nancy Michalski
Sources: N/A.
c3401.01.1989MDLenticular cloudSantiago de Compostela (La Coruña)15Photo
Sources: N/A.
c3507.11.1990Lenticular cloudUshuaia, Tierra del Fuego (Argentina)TFPhotoPhotoncisco Chechi (Grupo Alfa)
Sources: Mensajes Cósmicos, February 15, 1991. Carlos Ferguson.
c3627.12.1990Lenticular cloudSan Juanito, Chihuahua (México)CHIHPhotoGerardo León
Sources: N/A.
c3719.05.1991Lenticular cloudVillagarcía de Arosa (Pontevedra)36PhotoJorge Morales Ruiz
Sources: N/A.
c3809.04.1994Lenticular cloudValle de Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua (México)CHIHVideoCarmen Rey
Sources: Luis Ruiz Noguez. http://www.ojio.org/ovnis.html OJIO.
c3901.08.1994DLenticular cloudBrewster, Washington (USAWAPhoto
Sources: Larry Hatch database.
c4025.11.1994Lenticular cloudMezquite, Nevada (USANVPhoto
Sources: N/A.
c4107.11.1996Lenticular cloudArinaga (Gran Canaria)35PhotoAna Rosa Alonso
Sources: Diario de Las Palmas (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria), November 16, 1996.
c4201.01.1998DLenticular cloudAlicante (Alicante)03Photo
Sources: N/A.
c45.30.04.2000Lenticular cloudDay100 km to Zapala, Neuquén (Argentina)NEUPhotoAgustina de Alarcón
Sources: Rio Negro (General Roca), June 21, 2000. Carlos Ferguson.
c4301.11.2001DLenticular cloudSaratoga Springs, Utah (USAUTPhoto
Sources: N/A.
c4401.02.2003MDLenticular cloudTenerife38Photo
Sources: Stephane Bernard photogallery.

MISIDENTIFICATION TABLE:

From the 47 lenticular clouds mistaken for UFO photographic cases, this table shows, whenever data was available or found, it it is true or not that people misidentified the lenticular cloud.
CN, year, place Misidentified by
Witness Media Ufologists
c1 1909 DroebachNo dataNo dataNo data
c2 1951 KaiapoiNoN/ANo
c3 1953 JindabynaNoN/ANo
c4 1956 Pigtail PeakNo dataN/ANo
c5 1957 Camarillo
c6 1957 Vernet-Les-Bains
c7 1957 Tularosa
c8 1958 Redlands
c9 1964 Mount Rainier
c10 1965 Brno
c11 1966 La Matanza
c46 1966 Aosta
c12 1966 Tuxpan
c13 1966 Benidorm
c47 1968 Sierra Nevada
c14 1969 Sierra Tarahumara
c15 1970 Marasesti
c16 1973 Jaman-Tau
c17 1974 Perpignan
c18 1974 Lago Agrio
c19 1975 Vandellós
c20 1977 Col du Puymorens
c21 1977 Greenland
c22 1977 Perpignan
c23 1978 Bariloche
c24 1979 Tenerife
c25 1979 Lambert Lane
c26 1979 Mont-Blanc
c27 1980 Toluca
c28 1981 Bonn
c29 1981 Raub
c30 1982 Los Andes, Valparaíso
c31 1982 San Martín de los Andes
c32 1986 Irutup Island
c33 1988 Ivina
c34 1989 Santiago de Compostela
c35 1990 Ushuaia
c36 1990 San Juanito
c37 1991 Villagarcía de Arosa
c38 1994 Valle de Ciudad Juárez
c39 1994 Brewster
c40 1994 Mezquite
c41 1996 Arinaga
c42 1998 Alicante
c45 2000 Zapala
c43 2001 Saratoga Springs
c44 2003 Tenerife

FACTOID:

Skeptic books covers

Lenticular clouds are often used as cover of skeptik's UFO books:

This photograph of lenticular cloud is everyhwere. The real one was shot at Hawai by astronomer Wayne Holland.

REVIEW OF THE 47 CASES

c1. June 27, 1909, Droebach, Norway, photo by C. Stormer:

Investigation:

The place "Droebach" was not found, a typographical error is possible since "Droebach" means nothing while the place "Drosbach" does exist in Norway. No picture and no report for this case was found by this author on the Internet.

Discussion:

Although photographic cameras existed in 1909, the notion of a man taking a picture of a lenticular cloud in Norway 1909, at a time when nobody could have reasonably reported it as a "UFO" seems very far fetched.

Evaluation:

It is very likely illegitimate to consider the case as a UFO report which was explained as a lenticular cloud, and it was more likely only a photograph of a lenticular clouds, that maybe puzzled the photographer or made an unusual photograph. The case is thus labeled very dubious. The case is lacking data

Bibliography:

c2. 01.02.1951, Kaiapoi (New Zealand) photograph:

Investigation:

A search of the web resulted in the find on a "paranormal" forum [W1] that "1951-00-00; New Zealand, Kaiapoi: A UFO was reportedly photographed by an unidentified witness. No other details are available." The forum indicates as source "UFO II CD-ROM" by "Software Marketing Corporation 9830 South 51st Street Building A-131 Phoenix, Arizona 85044" of 1983.

No other source and no image was found was found on the Internet.

The USAF Project Blue Book document indicated by P2 is a listing of sightings for November to December 1951, and this sighting appears with this information: It is case #1019, it was the first case for December 1951, the date is "Winter", the place is "New Zealand", there was a photograph, the photographer's name is censored, and the explanation is noted "Other (lenticular cloud)".

There is actually much more to it in the Blue Book file [c2A1].

It all starts with a March 1954 handwritten letter by the witness, who explains the case from the very start: he writes that he always thought it was a lenticular cloud, although "98%" of his friends who saw his pictures said it was a flying saucer. What puzzled the witness was not the cloud per se but a part of it that seemed to detach and that he interprets as a whirlwind. The witness sent the photographs to Project Blue Book because he thought it might interest naval mearchants, seamen and pilots who might have seen a similar phenomena:

The transcription is:

"For some years I thought that I had only witnessed a whirl wind. I am now certain that the remainder of the bulk of the cloud remained about motionless before disappearing afterwards some time afterwards as steam does. The cloud was just an ordinary atmospherical cloud."

"However, I forward you the snaps hoping that although over two years and one half have passed that they will be of interest. Perhaps some naval mearchant seamen or pilot may have witnessed a similar sight, and you may compare notes."

Another USAF document is very telling of the skeptic mood at Blue Book at the time: a memo by Captain Hardin suggests that this report is "the type we want the public to react on.":

This is exactly the sort of attitude that is still found nowadays by "skeptics": to promote any case of "lenticular cloud" as "something people mistake for alien spaceship", while in this case, the real story is very different.

Evaluation:

Someone took picture of a lenticular cloud that was weird because a part of it detached. He needed no help in identifying the sighting as freak weather phenomena, despite friends who saw only the pictures that tried to convince him it was a flying saucer. The Air Force also identified a weather phenomena. The case was never a UFO sighting per se.

The photographs:

Several photographs were made. No quality print is available but photocopies at the Blue Book archive are available [c2A1], here is one of them:

Bibliography:

c3. May 31, 1953, Jindabyne, Snowy Mountains, New South Wales, Australia photograph:

Investigation:

I checked the primary ufological source for this sighting [c3M1], indicated by P2.

The case is introduced by Howard Menzel, an astronomer who was the first dedicated UFO reports debunker. He writes that a pile of orographic clouds was photographed on May 31, 1953, near Jindabyna [sic, Jindabyne], Snowy Mountains, New South Wales, Australia and reported as plate 47 in Weather in November 1954. Within parenthesis, he writes: "(which some observers reported as a hovering flying saucer"). Menzel specifies that "the cloud formed over a tub-shaped depression in the mountains and stayed stationary for more than an hour."

The book by Menzel provides no photographs, and a search on the Internet did not result in any finding of a corresponding UFO report or a photograph.

Discussion:

Every skeptic has stories such as this one to tell. Someone somewhere reported clouds as "flying saucers." In this case, there is no evidence that it was the case: we only have a "flying saucer ennemy", the first one who dedicated much time to "explain flying saucers", telling an anecdotal story. The book goes on about explaining how clouds form from water droplets and this is all to illustrate whether Kenneth Arnold saw mirages of mountain peaks or water droplets or orographic clouds, all pseudo-scientific explanation fot Arnold's sighting.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph, and no evidence the cloud was really reported as a UFO.

Bibliography:

c4. December 29, 1956, Pigtail Peak, White Pass, Washington, USA photograph:

Investigation:

UFO debunker Donald Menzel writes in his book that on the afternoon of December 29, 1956, a photographer for the Seattle Times newspaper was on top of Pigtail Peak near White Pass, in the state of Washington, not far from the area of Kenneth Arnold's sighting. The photographer was taking ski pictures for the newspaper under a beautiful weather.

Menzel says that just at sunset a strange object suddenly appeared toward the northeast horizon, and several skiers urged the photographer to "take a picture of the flying saucer," but the photographer waited because it was still far away and indistinct. Menzel continues: "The first object, now followed by a second one, moved rapidly toward Mount Ranier, began to sharpen in outline, and " both were soon so clearly visible that he was able to snap his unusual picture. The photograph shows two apparently solid, disklike objects, flattened, brilliantly white but dark at the bottom, apparently linked together by white streamers, skimming toward the mountain peak."

Menzel said that Reed made a full analysis of the weather conditions prevailing at the time the picture was taken and measured the "size of the clouds" from "radiosonde data provided by the Seattle-Tacoma Airport."

Menzel concludes that "the weather conditions that prevailed that day was suitable for the formation of saucerlike clouds."

Discussion:

From the available Menzel text, it is apparent that the phenomenon is only supposedly explained as lenticular clouds using a strange method: "radiosonde data" that are claimed to provide "the size of the clouds" whereas the only allow to provide possible presence and types of clouds.

Typical of Menzelian UFO literature, essential matters are left to the imagination of the reader. Did the photographer take any picture after all, when the object moved closer? What about the "sudden" apparition of the object at the horizon? What about their "rapid move of the object toward Mount Rainier followed by a second"?

This is not ufology.

I could verify that "Weatherwise" indeed published an article by meteorologist Richard J. Reed [R1], headlined "Flying Saucers Over Mt. Rainier", in April 1959, not 1958.

Reed is also mentioned in a dissertation [P1] as being a University of Washington at Seattle who politely refused that the topic of UFOs is approached by scientists James McDonald in a conference at the univesity, and refered as a scientists "who once wrote an article attributing all UFOs to lenticular clouds."

Evaluation:

Probable Menzelian-type inventions for skeptical meteorologist. Lack of data. Unlikely explanation if the report really was as Menzel indicates. Story possibly made out by Richard Reed to make an example.

Bibliography:

c5. March 24, 1957, Camarillo, California, Agnes Sanborn photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates as sources "George M. Eberhart, International UFO Reporter, Vol 29, No 2, Summer 2004, p 21. Max B. Miller (ed), Flying Saucer Pictorial, Arizill, 1967, p 38."

This author does not own these sources.

However, this author notes that in ">Conversations with Dr. Jung", an article by Lou Zinsstag published in Flying Saucer Review in 1963, interesting clue about this case exist.

Lou Zinsstag was convinced that some UFO reports are cause by alien visitors, and visited Dr Carl Gustav Jung, who was the cousin of his late mother, and convinced that UFOs are visions of things in the sky caused by things in the "collective psyche" of humans. Zinsstag told [Z1]:
"A few months later, with the splendid colour photo by Mrs. Agnes Sanborn in my bag, I went again to Dr. Jung's house. He was truly amazed when he looked at the picture and noticed at once the resemblance of the object with the Adamski model, as he admitted. [...] In conclusion he added that in his opinion many sighting reports of recent date belonged to the realm of religious vision as coming from people "who in day- or night-dreams perceived the symbol of eternity in the sky. "And what about the cigar-shaped form?" I asked rather stubbornly. He hesitated before saying in good humour: "To tell you frankly, they worry me. I admit that only the round objects fit into my category". Again, I admired him for his honesty."

Discussion:

If C.J. Jung noted "at once" that the photograph showed a flying saucer "à la Adamski", there is sufficient doubt about the theory that it shows a lenticular cloud. It might actually show a hoaxed "Adamski saucer."

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c6. August 15, 1957 Vernet-Les-Bains, Pyrénées orientales (France) FRA PHOTO Morel photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c7. October 16, 1957 Tularosa, New Mexico USA NM PHOTO Ella Louise Fortune: photograph:

Investigation:

The photograph appears "all over the pace" on the Internet, books and magazine. Very little detail is attached as regards the sighting. From various sources, the following story comes out: on October 16, 1957, at about 01:30 p.m., Ella Louise Fortune, a nurse at the Mescalero Indian Reservation near Three Rivers, New Mexico, took this image while driving on Highway 54. She stated that the UFO was motionless over Holloman AFB.

The sightings listing for 1957 of the Nuclear Connection Project lists:

#4869: 1957/10/16 13:30 5 106:4:40W 33:19:20N 3333 NAM USA NMX 7 7 N/TULAROSA,NM:NURSE FOTOs WHT-GLOW OVOID ovr HOLLOMAN RANGE:/r219p11+/r11p245 Ref# 210 The APRO BULLETIN. (J & C Lorenzen) Volume 58 Issue 5 DESERT

The Fortean Pictures Library lists the image as a possible UFO image taken on October 16, 1957 by Ella Louise Fortune as it hovered over Holloman Test Range, New Mexico, USA. They add that "some people believe this 'UFO' was a cloud." Their version of the photograph is mirrored and has a prnounced reddish hue.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

This is an easy to find "classic" photograph. Whatever the resolution, it shows no clue of being anything else than a cloud indeed:

Bibliography:

Henri Durrant 1970.

c8. December 13, 1958 Redlands, California, USA, John Penney photograph:

Investigation:

The USAF Blue Book source [c8U1] indicated in Fotocat [c8F1] is a sightings listing of December 1958. The case number is 620313, the place is Redlands, California, it is a photographic case, the witness' name is censored and the explanation is note as "Other (lenticular cloud)".

This author found no other information.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

This author could not locate this case's photograph.

Bibliography:

http://www.bluebookarchive.org/page.aspx?PageCode=NARA-PBB1-208 USAF. Larry Robinson.

c9. January 1, 1964 M D Mount Rainier, Washington USA WA photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c10. September 1, 1965 (Day uncertain) Brno, Czecoslovakia, photograph:

Investigation: U.F.O.s, Robert Jackson, Shooting Star, 1995, p 13. Luis Ruiz Noguez.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c11. 1966, La Matanza, Tenerife, Spain photograph:

Investigation:

No information found.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c12. April 16, 1966 Tuxpan, Jalisco, Mexico Hector M. Horta photograph:

Investigation:

No information found.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c13. November 23, 1966 Benidorm, Alicante, Spain, Gunther Fensk Wildemann photograph:

Investigation:

I found practically nothing about this photograph. Werner Walter, a German ufologist who thinks there are no extraterrestrial visitors on our planet wrote [c13W1]:
"L'OVNI sur Benidorm en Espagne photographié le 23 novembre 1966 n'a pas de valeur puisque la soucoupe volante à voir ici n'est rien de plus qu'un nuage de type lenticulaire éclairé par le coucher du soleil."

J. Benitez, a spanish ufologist, wrote [c13B1]:
"November 22, 1966. Benidorm, Spain.

Le photographe Gunther Wildemann rend compte qu'il a observé dans le ciel un objet ayant une forme de disque. Il était cinq heure et demi de l'après-midi.

Gunther a rapporté que l'ovni est resté immobile dans le ciel durant 15 minutes.

Malgré le témoignage du témoin et sa photographie, certains chercheurs ont douté et continuent à douter de la nature "ovni" de l'image qui apparaît dans la photographie. Ceci est semblable à un très grand nuage et il s'ensuit que les doutes persistent.

Pouvait-il agir d'un objet "camouflé" sous un nuage ? Ce ne serait pas le premier ni le dernier cas...

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c14. 1969, Sierra Tarahumara, Chihuahua, Mexico photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c15. October 12, 1970 Marasesti, Romania, Julien Weverbergh photograph:

Investigation:

A search on the Internet yelded no results. A search in "OVNIS en Russie" by Boris Shurinov, Guy Trédaniel, 1995, yelded no result.

Julien Weverbergh is the co-author of a book with Ion Hobana bout UFO sightings in USSR and eastern europe countries.

While P2 says that there is a photograph of a lenticular cloud take at Marasesti in Romania on October 12, 1970 by Julien Weverbergh in the English edition of this book at page 105, my search in the French version of the book [c15H2] yelded negative result. There is not lenticular cloud photograph near pages 90-100 of the French edition, nor elsewhere, and the case appears nowhere in the rest of the book. The only reference to a UFO sighting in Marasesti is at pages 230 and 346, the witness is not Julien Weverbergh, no photograph was taken and it was not on October 12, 1970, but on June 1, 1969.

The three witness said they saw a glowing greenish pulsating object that crossed the sky at the level of the horizon at a huge speed.

Discussion:

It is hard fro me to believe that the English version of Hobana and Weverberg's book is different from the French version.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph.

Bibliography:

c16. February 5, 1973, Jaman-Tau, Ural, Russia photograph:

Investigation:

A search on the Internet yelded no results. A search in "Les OVNI en URSS et dans les Pays de l'Est", Ion Hobana and Julien Weverbergh, Robert Laffont, 1972, yelded no result. A search in "OVNIS en Russie" by Boris Shurinov, Guy Trédaniel, 1995, yelded no result.

Discussion:

With no source, no data found, a discussion of the case is impossible.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph.

Bibliography:

c17. August 11, 1974 Perpignan, France, Lolita Rassin photograph:

Investigation:

A search on the Internet yelded no result. A search in my collection of 63 newspapers articles for French UFO sightings in 1974 yelded no results.

I unfortunaly do not own the source indictaed by P2>, the ufology magazine "Lumières Dans La Nuit" for June-July 1975.

Discussion:

With no source, no data found, a discussion of the case is impossible.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph.

Bibliography:

c18. November 11, 1974 (undertain day), Lago Agrio, Neuquén, Argentina, Victor and Silvia de Cerasale photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates in [c18F1] that the source is "Cuarta Dimensión, 15, p 35" and specifies that he did not consult this source. This author does not own this source either. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

With no source, no data found, a discussion of the case is impossible.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph.

Bibliography:

c19. March 22, 1975, Vandellós, Tarragona, Spain, Vicente Ballester photograph:

Investigation:

The photograph and a report were not found on the Internet.

Discussion:

Vicente Ballester is a long time ufologist with experience and there is no chance that he would have mistaken and photograph a lenticular cloud while not realizing what it was. Very likely, the case is actually only an example of a lenticular cloud recongnized as such by the witness and photograph as example of lenticular cloud, not as UFO.

Evaluation:

Not a case of lenticular cloud that generated a UFO report. Identified by witness. Irrelevant.

Bibliography:

c20. January 19, 1977, Col du Puymarens, Ariège, France, Patricia Monin photograph:

Investigation:

A search on the Internet yelded no result. This author does not own "La Depêche du Midi" for January 20 and 30, 1977, nor Perspectivas Ufológicas, February 1996 indicated by P2> as sources.

Discussion:

With no source, no data found, a discussion of the case is impossible.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph.

Bibliography:

c21. February 1, 1977 (uncertain day), Greenland Naval Station, Denmark photograph:

Investigation:

No source is indicated by P2. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

Discussion:

With no source, no data found, a discussion of the case is impossible.

Evaluation:

Lack of data, lack of photograph.

Bibliography:

c22. November 12, 1977 Perpignan, France, José María Casas-Huguet photograph:

Investigation:

The photographer indicated by P2, José Maria Casas-Huguet, was a ufologist, who in 1976 and since 1972 was director of CEI, "Centro de Estudios Interplanetarios", a spanish ufology group.

A search on the Internet did nopt result in the finding of any witness report or photograph of a lenticular cloud mistaken for a UFO in November 1977 in Perpignan.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c23. May 2, 1978, San Carlos Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina, Elida Peláez de Corletto photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates as source "Perspectivas Ufológicas, February 1996. Luis Ruiz Noguez. Clarin (Buenos Aires), end August 1978. Roberto E. Banchs. Cosmovisión, 3, October 1978. Cuarta Dimensión, No 72, 1978 (Carlos Ferguson). http://www.geocities.com/capecanaveral/3823/ar780824.htm"

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c24. 1979, Tenerife, Spain photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provided no source. A searcm on the Internet allowed this author to find several clouds photographs from Tenerife in 1979 [c24I1], although those are not necessarily lenticular clouds and no evidence of associated UFO reports was found.

On example is the photograph shown here, which is captioned:
OBJETO OBSERVADO EN LAS ISLAS CANARIAS El 5 DE MARZO DE 1979

Antonio González Llopiz, autor de estas impresionantes fotos, se dirigía por la carretera del sur de Gran Canaria, a la altura de Puerto Rico, cuando le sorprendió esta puesta de sol extraña, tomo su cámara y comenzó a disparar.

One similar such photograph, in black and white, appears in a Jenny Rendle UFO book [c24R1] with a caption sayint that it is one of two colour slides brought back to Englend by two men who observed the spectacular UFO event over the Canary ISlands in March 1979. Randles adds that "several quite independant sequences of this phenomenon exist on film."

Discussion:

If the pictures and comments I found are the correct ones, it does not seem that a lenticular cloud event is at work here, it seems to be all rather about a rocket's contrails illuminated by the sun.

Evaluation:

Probably no lenticular clouds, or lack of data.

The photograph:

The source [c24I1] has several pictures, such as this one:

Bibliography:

c25. 1979, Lambert Lane, Arizona, USA, "Johnny" photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provided no source. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c26. February 3, 1979 Mont-Blanc, France, Annie Trubert photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates "Jean-Michel Ligeron, O.V.N.I. en Ardennes, 1981, p 195" as source. This author does not own this book. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c27. 1980, Toluca, Mexico City, Mexico, Rolando Muñoz photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provided no source. A search on the Internet yelded no results.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c28. 1981, Bonn, Germany photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provided no source. A search on the Internet yelded no results.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c29. August 30, 1981, Raub, Malaysia, Heng Chiang Teck photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provides no sources. However, a search on the Internet allowd this author to find a german speaking texte by Malaysian ufologist Ahmad Jamaudin, which is said to have been published in the "Journal Fur UFO-Forshung" Nummer 6, 1983 published by Gemeinschaft Zur Erforschung Unbekannter Phänomene (GEP), Germany.

Jamaludin tells that the story surfaced on the frontpage of a local newspaper of Malaysia on June 6, 1982, with a headline about an un-natural lighted object, and an article that said that nobody had been able to provide an explanation. The article said that a teacher, Heng Chiang Teck, of the Chung-Ching shcool in Raub saw a lighted round object in the sky while he was in the schoolyard. The teacher had heard about flying saucers and took a picture. The object was there a minute (at least?) and then "disappeared".

Jamaludin wrote to the schoolteacher to get more information on the sighting and received 2 photographs of the strange thing, made at 18:15 on 30 August 1981 in Raub. The witness described the phenomenon as very bright, in the shape of a saucer. It remained motionless more than 6 minutes before "it disappeared". Camera type and film are documented.

Jamaludin thought about the photos and concludes that it is obviously a lenticural cloud, lighted by the setting sun. Jamaludin adds that Ground Saucer Watch analyzed the images with a computer and came out with the same explanation.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

The photograph is shown on source [c29J1]

Bibliography:

c30. 1982, Los Andes, Valparaiso, Chile photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provides no sources. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c31. January 15, 1982, San Martín de los Andes, Neuquén, Argentina, Juan Carlos Ferreyra photograph:

Investigation:

The source is P2 himself. A search on the Internet by this author yelded no result.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

Bibliography:

c32. September 8, 1986, Irutup Island, Kuriles (Russia) photograph:

Investigation:

The source indicated by P2 is a web page in Russian by ufologist Mikhail Gershtein.

L'article par Mikhail Gershtein indique que la photographie a été prise le 8 septembre 1986 à l'île d'Irutup. Elle a été imprimée des centaines des fois, de journaux en revues, et a orné la couverture du livre d'A. et H. Kuzovkina. constatant un manque d'informations, Mikhail Gershtein est remonté aux sources premières et a trouvé le récit suivant de B. Kazmin, le photographe:
"Je me trouvais sur l'île avec l'expédition. A 20:00 (le ciel s'assombrissait déjà) je suis sorti sur le perron de la maison. Mon attention a été attirée par l'objet étrange, qui était suspendu au-dessus du golfe. Selon ses formes, il rappelait une lentille d'un diamètre immenses de près de 100 mètres. L'objet avait une forme précisément délimitée. Il n'y avait aucun effets sonores ou lumineux. Graduellement l'objet, ... a fusionné avec le fond du ciel serein devenu déjà sombre..."

Mikhail Gershtein explique qu'il s'agit d'un nuage lenticulaire et en donne des explications détaillées. Il évoque des préSentations délirantes nombreuses de la photo dans les milieux scientifiques, ufologiques, parapsychologique Russes, allant jusqu'à une analyse par un voyant extra-lucide qui déClare que le vaisseau vien de Jupiter, mesure 120 mètres, que ses occunantssont âgés de 160 à 240 ans pour le plus vieux et ainsi de suite.

Mikhail Gershtein explique qu'en 1988, la photo a été montrée dans un documentaire intitulé "A la recherches des nouveaux venus" et que la voix off expliquait clairement que la photo montre seulement un nuage, mais que cela n'a pas suffit a l'éliminer des magazines ufologiques qui ont suivis, comme la revue "l'Echo de la planète", N 33-34, de 1990, qui l'appelle encore "soucoupe volante."

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

The photograph is shown at ref. [C32G1]:

Bibliography:

c33. December 15, 1988 Ivina, Utah, USA, Jean and Nancy Michalski photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates no sources for the case. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

No data.

Bibliography:

c34. 1989, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates no sources for the case. A search on the Internet yelded no result.

Discussion:

Evaluation:

No data.

Bibliography:

c35. November 7, 1990 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina, Francisco Chechi (Grupo Alfa) photograph:

Investigation:

P2 indicates "Mensajes Cósmicos, February 15, 1991. Carlos Ferguson" as source.

P2 indicates as photographer Francisco Chechi (Grupo Alfa). This photographer is actually a so-called "contactee" who founded the UFO cult, Grupo Alfa.

The photograph or a sighting report were not found.

Discussion:

It is possible that some photograph of a lenticular cloud was taken by this witness and showed as "proof of alien visitors" by the witness, but this is very uncertain.

No indication was found that such a photograph exists or that any ufologist saw any evidence of whatever nature in it.

Evaluation:

Lack of data. No photograph

Bibliography:

c36. December 27, 1990, San Juanito, Chihuahua, Mexico, Gerardo León photograph:

Investigation:

P2 does not provide sources for the case. A search on the Internet did not result in any photograph or report on a lenticular cloud or alleged UFO photographed on December 27, 1990, San Juanito, Chihuahua, Mexico, Gerardo León.

Facciones del Grupo Rama en América Latina promueven el “Proyecto de Evacuación Mundial del Comando Ashtar” a base de conferencias de Sixto Paz Wells. Hacia finales de la década de los ochentas, el Dr. Gerardo León, del Centro Cultural de la Mexicanidad, de Gómez Palacio, Dgo. me invito a la presentación de un video promocional en una casa de Cd. Lerdo, Dgo (México). Allí observamos un maratónico video de cuatro horas sobre el “Proyecto de Evacuación Mundial del Comando Ashtar”. A partir de entonces se formó una agrupación denominada “Grupo Amigos de la Humanidad” que en al menos dos ocasiones ha traído al líder del Grupo Rama, Sixto Paz Wells, al teatro Alberto M. Alvarado para exponer sus experiencias como contactado. El Dr. Gerardo León en otra ocasión presentó otro video sobre el inicio de la Era de Acuario en el año 2013, fecha en la cual según la interpretación del calendario de los mayas, sería el fin de los tiempos.

However, there seem to exist [c38M1] a Dr Gerardo Leon, who seems to be the director of the Centro Cultural de la Mexicanidad and is seemingly and allegedly involved in a "Grupo Rama" and a "Project of World-wide Evacuation of the Ashtar Command" in relation with claims based on interpretations of "the Mayan Calendar" that the earth will end in a disaster in 2013 and only those earthling that believe in a galactic alien "Ashtar Command" would be saved.

No indication was found that such a photograph exists or that any ufologist saw any evidence of whatever nature in it.

Discussion:

It is possible that some photograph of a lenticular cloud was taken by this witness and showed as "proof of alien visitors" by the witness, but this is very uncertain.

Evaluation:

Lack of data. No photograph

Bibliography:

c37. May 19, 1991 Villagarcía de Arosa (Pontevedra) ESP 36 PHOTO Jorge Morales Ruiz photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c38. 09.04.1994 Valle de Juárez, Chihuahua (México) MEX CHIH VIDEO Carmen Rey photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c39. 01.08.1994 D Brewster, Washington USA WA photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c40. November 25, 1994 Mezquite, Nevada, photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c41. 07.11.1996 Arinaga (Gran Canaria) ESP 35 PHOTO Ana Rosa Alonso photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c42. January 1, 1998 D Alicante (Alicante) ESP 03 photograph:

Investigation:

Discussion:

Evaluation:

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c43. November 2001, Saratoga Springs, Utah, USA, photograph:

Investigation:

P2 does not provide a source. However, a search on the Internet quickly allowed this author to find out the information on this case. The photograph, a comment by the webmaster and a proposed explanation appear on the website, quoted here:
Utah , March 2001 Cloud covered UFO?

These Photos are very interesting, a near perfect UFO shaped cloud? or a UFO hiding itself in a artificial cloud? Photos were taken with a digital camera. These photos were sent to us 12/2/2001.

"We were house hunting... the picture was taken from Saratoga Springs which is on the West side of Utah Lake in Lehi, so I think, I think it was in-between Timp. Mt. and the Mt. where squaw peak is. One thing....your right if this is a cloud covered UFO it is enormous. Susan"

UUFOH NOTE: This is probably a cloud formation though a very odd one.

Discussion:

The website where the report and photograph appears is titled "Believe It or Not They are Really Here" and is obviously an amateur's page, not the webiste of any serious ufologist or ufology organisation. The webmaster notes: "we would like to show you some information that we have collected for many months in our simple website, which might make nonbelievers believers."

Despite obvious inexperience, and wild-eyed comments on UFOs that disguize in clouds, the webmaster nevertheless notes that the photograph shows "probably a cloud formation though a very odd one."

This hardly makes the case anything like a lenticular cloud UFO report that fooled proponents of the extraterrestrial visitors theory.

Evaluation:

Lenticular cloud picture, possibly related to UFOs by the witness, explained by unexperience primary investigator.

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c44. 2003, Tenerife photograph:

Investigation:

P2 provides no source for this case.

While a search of all UFO reports from Teneriffe or the Canaries island in 2003 at any date of the year yelded no cloud reported as UFO and no photographs of clouds reported as UFO, a web page was found that shows a number of pitcures of lenticular clouds at this location in 2003.

One the picture is headlined "OVNI-NUBE", i.e. "cloud UFO".

The caption reads:
"What caught the attention to this cloud is its inner ring, that became more visible, adopting that reddish coloration, with the arrival of dusk, and the fact that it appeared isolated in the sky, without more clouds. It looked like a UFO rotating on the zone of Candlemas, to the south of Santa Cruz de Tenerife."

The photographer is Pilar García de la Rosa and only the year, 2003, is indicated.

No indication whatsoever is given on that web page that anoyne ever actually thought it was an alien spaceship of that anyone saw in the cloud anything else than a cloud interesting enough to deserve a photograph.

Discussion:

It is more and more apparent that P2 was not anymore listing cases of lenticular clouds mistaken as UFO, but collecting lenticular clouds photographs from the Internet, whether they did or did not generate UFO sighting reports.

Evaluation:

Not a lenticular cloud reported as UFO.

The photograph:

Bibliography:

c45.30.04.2000 DayLenticular cloudDay100 km to Zapala, Neuquén (Argentina)NEUPhotoAgustina de Alarcón Sources: Rio Negro (General Roca), June 21, 2000. Carlos Ferguson. c46.01.01.1966MDLenticular cloudAosta (Italy)AOPhoto Sources: Dossier OVNI, Orbis, 1997, issue number 11, p 47. c47.07.01.1968Lenticular cloudSierra Nevada (Granada)18PhotoIgnacio DarnaudeIgnacio Darnaude. Sources: CEI (Barcelona), quoting La aviazione di altri planeti, May 1968.

APPENDIX

List of issues:

Id Topic Severity Date noted Raised by Noted by Description Proposal Status
1 Data Medium May 25, 2006 This author This author No references of sources in the 44 cases table. Author asked P2 where he can get the references. Immediately solved by P2 Closed.
2 Format Low May 25, 2006 This author This author Dates would be ambiguous in European format except in the full original listing where format is clearly indicated D/M/Y in header. This author changed the dates to GUP format according to SOP002 in the study body. Closed
3 Data High May 28, 2006 This author This author c1 has no report, no source, no photograph. Open

Study journal:

May 25, 2006 02:45:P1 asks a ufology discussion group whether there are cases in which UFOs were explained as lenticular clouds, as he could not find any authentic such cases.
May 25, 2006 10:30:P2 provides the listing of 44 photographic cases cited here, extracted from his UFO photographic case database, specifying it is "grossly outdated in several aspects".
May 25, 2006 11:00:P1 thanks P2 and specifies that "col du Puymorens, Ariège", instead of "col du Puymarens, Ariége".
May 25, 2006 11:14:This author asks P2 where he could find the references for the 44 cases.
May 25, 2006 :P1 also asks P2 where he could find the references for the 44 cases.
May 25, 2006 :P2 says reference, if any, ar from the ufological literature and proposes to get in touch privately with him about it.
May 25, 2006 :This author privately contacts P2 and asks whether he could get references for the 44 cases.
May 25, 2006 14:00:This author creates an HTML formated version of the listing identical to the original listing which was an electronic spreasheet.
May 25, 2006 16:00:P2 sends this author a listing of the same cases with sources references for 27 of the 44 cases, 3 more cases, and minor additional information and asks for feedback if new information is found by this author.
May 25, 2006 16:20:This author thanks P2 for the additional information and let him know that he will provide feedback.
May 25, 2006 17:20:This author integrates the information just received to the case table and study body.


Feedback  |  Top  |  Back  |  Forward  |  Map  |  List |  Home

This page was last updated on May 25, 2006